VALUATION OF…
Motor Dealerships
Franchise showrooms and workshops, valued on brand-standard compliance, bay configuration and dealer-network dynamics.
Content status: Methodology in place — Caselaw and Market Information are added incrementally.
Methodology
Motor dealerships are typically valued on an income basis where let to an independent dealer group on a commercial lease, using the Income Capitalisation Method. Where the property is owner-occupied and no market rental evidence exists, Direct Comparison or the Cost Approach (Depreciated Replacement Cost) may be applied instead.
Applying the Big Five framework, the Income Generating Units are the showroom, workshop bays, parts store and open display yard, each of which commands a different rate and should be analysed separately rather than averaged across the whole GLA. Contract rental is compared to market rental for similar dealership premises, a vacancy allowance and normalised operating expenditure are applied, and the resulting income is capitalised at a rate reflecting the brand covenant, franchise agreement term and location on a recognised motor city or arterial route.
The size and configuration of the display yard is frequently the dominant value driver for a dealership, and a Direct Comparison cross-check on a rate per square metre of yard and showroom area, drawn from sales of comparable dealership premises, should be used to test the primary valuation.
Sources
Sources will be listed here as this section is written — each an external link or an uploaded document.
Caselaw
Case law, regulatory rulings and expert-determination disputes relevant to valuing this asset class. Each entry cites its source and summarises the practice implication for valuers — this is not investment, financial, or legal advice.
